Information on Result #910643
Linear OOA(9130, 67, F9, 2, 116) (dual of [(67, 2), 4, 117]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(910, 7, F9, 2, 10) (dual of [(7, 2), 4, 11]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(910, 9, F9, 2, 10) (dual of [(9, 2), 8, 11]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;8,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(910, 9, F9, 2, 10) (dual of [(9, 2), 8, 11]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(9116, 60, F9, 2, 105) (dual of [(60, 2), 4, 106]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OOA(956, 30, F9, 2, 52) (dual of [(30, 2), 4, 53]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,7P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OOA(956, 30, F9, 2, 52) (dual of [(30, 2), 4, 53]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(9130, 67, F9, 2, 115) (dual of [(67, 2), 4, 116]-NRT-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction for OOAs | |