Information on Result #941679
Linear OOA(2132, 68, F2, 2, 89) (dual of [(68, 2), 4, 90]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(212, 8, F2, 2, 9) (dual of [(8, 2), 4, 10]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(2116, 60, F2, 2, 79) (dual of [(60, 2), 4, 80]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(418, 20, F4, 15) (dual of [20, 2, 16]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(418, 21, F4, 15) (dual of [21, 3, 16]-code), using
- Simplex code S(3,4) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(418, 21, F4, 15) (dual of [21, 3, 16]-code), using
- linear OOA(24, 3, F2, 2, 4) (dual of [(3, 2), 2, 5]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;2,2) [i]
- linear OA(418, 20, F4, 15) (dual of [20, 2, 16]-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(2132, 68, F2, 2, 88) (dual of [(68, 2), 4, 89]-NRT-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction for OOAs | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(2132, 68, F2, 2, 87) (dual of [(68, 2), 4, 88]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | Linear OOA(2132, 68, F2, 2, 86) (dual of [(68, 2), 4, 87]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | Linear OOA(2132, 68, F2, 2, 85) (dual of [(68, 2), 4, 86]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | Linear OOA(2125, 64, F2, 2, 82) (dual of [(64, 2), 3, 83]-NRT-code) | [i] | Truncation for OOAs | |
| 6 | Linear OOA(2132, 34, F2, 4, 89) (dual of [(34, 4), 4, 90]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |