Information on Result #941871
Linear OOA(4186, 96, F4, 2, 149) (dual of [(96, 2), 6, 150]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(46, 6, F4, 2, 5) (dual of [(6, 2), 6, 6]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(46, 12, F4, 5) (dual of [12, 6, 6]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(12,4) [i]
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(46, 12, F4, 5) (dual of [12, 6, 6]-code), using
- linear OOA(4174, 90, F4, 2, 143) (dual of [(90, 2), 6, 144]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(1615, 18, F16, 15) (dual of [18, 3, 16]-code or 18-arc in PG(14,16)), using
- Denniston code D(1,16) [i]
- linear OOA(48, 5, F4, 2, 8) (dual of [(5, 2), 2, 9]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;2,4) [i]
- linear OA(1615, 18, F16, 15) (dual of [18, 3, 16]-code or 18-arc in PG(14,16)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(4186, 96, F4, 2, 148) (dual of [(96, 2), 6, 149]-NRT-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction for OOAs | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(4186, 96, F4, 2, 147) (dual of [(96, 2), 6, 148]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||