Best Known (6, 6+17, s)-Nets in Base 128
(6, 6+17, 216)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (6, 23, 216)-net over F128, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (5, 23, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
(6, 6+17, 243)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (6, 23, 243)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 242)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 243, using
(6, 6+17, 260)-Net in Base 128 — Constructive
(6, 23, 260)-net in base 128, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (6, 24, 260)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 21, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 21, 260)-net over F256, using
(6, 6+17, 321)-Net in Base 128
(6, 23, 321)-net in base 128, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on (6, 32, 321)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 28, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 28, 321)-net over F256, using
(6, 6+17, 18476)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (6, 23, 18477)-net in base 128, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (6, 22, 18477)-net in base 128, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 22836 565809 678126 950638 259591 145581 384109 203443 > 12822 [i]