Best Known (33−22, 33, s)-Nets in Base 128
(33−22, 33, 288)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (11, 33, 288)-net over F128, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (9, 33, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
(33−22, 33, 296)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (11, 33, 296)-net over F128, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (10, 33, 296)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 295)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 296, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 295)-sequence over F128, using
(33−22, 33, 321)-Net in Base 128
(11, 33, 321)-net in base 128, using
- 39 times m-reduction [i] based on (11, 72, 321)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 63, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 63, 321)-net over F256, using
(33−22, 33, 81061)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (11, 33, 81062)-net in base 128, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 3451 242139 950066 631203 461218 732881 612511 499237 110334 605326 005734 535560 > 12833 [i]