Best Known (43−25, 43, s)-Nets in Base 128
(43−25, 43, 384)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (18, 43, 384)-net over F128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 15, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- digital (3, 28, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128 (see above)
- digital (3, 15, 192)-net over F128, using
(43−25, 43, 473)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (18, 43, 473)-net over F128, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(12843, 473, F128, 25) (dual of [473, 430, 26]-code), using
- 200 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (6, 0, 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 32 times 0, 1, 57 times 0, 1, 81 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(12832, 262, F128, 25) (dual of [262, 230, 26]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,236P) [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 262, using
- 200 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (6, 0, 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 32 times 0, 1, 57 times 0, 1, 81 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(12832, 262, F128, 25) (dual of [262, 230, 26]-code), using
(43−25, 43, 514)-Net in Base 128 — Constructive
(18, 43, 514)-net in base 128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- (2, 14, 257)-net in base 128, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (2, 16, 257)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 14, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 14, 257)-net over F256, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (2, 16, 257)-net in base 128, using
- (4, 29, 257)-net in base 128, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (4, 32, 257)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 28, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 28, 257)-net over F256, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (4, 32, 257)-net in base 128, using
- (2, 14, 257)-net in base 128, using
(43−25, 43, 988075)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (18, 43, 988076)-net in base 128, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (18, 42, 988076)-net in base 128, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 31828 883295 805807 618039 649716 172371 639535 857759 503098 807060 850490 144502 875413 322788 926616 > 12842 [i]