Best Known (56−30, 56, s)-Nets in Base 128
(56−30, 56, 438)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 56, 438)-net over F128, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (26, 58, 438)-net over F128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 17, 150)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128, using
- digital (9, 41, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- digital (1, 17, 150)-net over F128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(56−30, 56, 518)-Net in Base 128 — Constructive
(26, 56, 518)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (19, 49, 518)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 17, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (2, 32, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- digital (2, 17, 259)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(56−30, 56, 1092)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (26, 56, 1092)-net over F128, using
(56−30, 56, 3722882)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 56, 3722883)-net in base 128, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 10086 940868 490334 843653 607747 564560 402671 274820 193279 046253 087163 639789 076950 376293 346061 946543 936478 881342 792342 610816 > 12856 [i]