Best Known (66−34, 66, s)-Nets in Base 128
(66−34, 66, 504)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 66, 504)-net over F128, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (32, 68, 504)-net over F128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 23, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- digital (9, 45, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- digital (5, 23, 216)-net over F128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(66−34, 66, 548)-Net in Base 128 — Constructive
(32, 66, 548)-net in base 128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- (6, 23, 260)-net in base 128, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (6, 24, 260)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 21, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 21, 260)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (6, 24, 260)-net in base 128, using
- digital (9, 43, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- (6, 23, 260)-net in base 128, using
(66−34, 66, 1715)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (32, 66, 1715)-net over F128, using
(66−34, 66, large)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 66, large)-net in base 128, because
- 32 times m-reduction [i] would yield (32, 34, large)-net in base 128, but