Best Known (50−35, 50, s)-Nets in Base 128
(50−35, 50, 288)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (15, 50, 288)-net over F128, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (9, 50, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
(50−35, 50, 386)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (15, 50, 386)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 385)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 386, using
(50−35, 50, 513)-Net in Base 128
(15, 50, 513)-net in base 128, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (15, 56, 513)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (8, 49, 513)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 512)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- K1,1 from the tower of function fields by Niederreiter and Xing based on the tower by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F256 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 512)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (8, 49, 513)-net over F256, using
(50−35, 50, 66959)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (15, 50, 66960)-net in base 128, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (15, 49, 66960)-net in base 128, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 17 920662 822035 815869 304560 921112 313592 135110 678634 404925 105798 464251 308698 203068 230485 423841 027852 959576 > 12849 [i]