Best Known (28, 28+36, s)-Nets in Base 128
(28, 28+36, 438)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (28, 64, 438)-net over F128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 19, 150)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128, using
- digital (9, 45, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- digital (1, 19, 150)-net over F128, using
(28, 28+36, 516)-Net in Base 128 — Constructive
(28, 64, 516)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (20, 56, 516)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 19, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (1, 37, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- digital (1, 19, 258)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(28, 28+36, 799)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (28, 64, 799)-net over F128, using
(28, 28+36, 1847678)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (28, 64, 1847679)-net in base 128, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 726 841857 546235 830046 343326 933584 011752 099672 778381 795895 313387 908783 749496 207348 224764 734956 913877 977768 228557 989536 832762 035599 199995 > 12864 [i]