Best Known (10, 10+45, s)-Nets in Base 128
(10, 10+45, 288)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (10, 55, 288)-net over F128, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (9, 55, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
(10, 10+45, 296)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (10, 55, 296)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 295)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 296, using
(10, 10+45, 321)-Net in Base 128
(10, 55, 321)-net in base 128, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on (10, 64, 321)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 56, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 56, 321)-net over F256, using
(10, 10+45, 10588)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (10, 55, 10589)-net in base 128, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (10, 54, 10589)-net in base 128, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 615669 857906 068526 258958 252357 071238 483047 326722 564056 403484 184441 012205 478540 184669 005193 344678 702649 623930 244148 > 12854 [i]