Best Known (61−50, 61, s)-Nets in Base 128
(61−50, 61, 288)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (11, 61, 288)-net over F128, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (9, 61, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
(61−50, 61, 296)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (11, 61, 296)-net over F128, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (10, 61, 296)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 295)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 296, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 295)-sequence over F128, using
(61−50, 61, 321)-Net in Base 128
(11, 61, 321)-net in base 128, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on (11, 72, 321)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 63, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 63, 321)-net over F256, using
(61−50, 61, 11090)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (11, 61, 11091)-net in base 128, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 347 252862 742024 662871 682009 560618 864845 019183 592526 936420 429107 493137 027523 064281 182703 606487 365491 575640 750670 048965 331711 610864 > 12861 [i]