Best Known (10−8, 10, s)-Nets in Base 128
(10−8, 10, 150)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (2, 10, 150)-net over F128, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (1, 10, 150)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128, using
(10−8, 10, 172)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (2, 10, 172)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 171)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
(10−8, 10, 257)-Net in Base 128 — Constructive
(2, 10, 257)-net in base 128, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (2, 16, 257)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 14, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 14, 257)-net over F256, using
(10−8, 10, 3229)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (2, 10, 3230)-net in base 128, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 1182 053416 876909 825191 > 12810 [i]