Best Known (11, 30, s)-Nets in Base 128
(11, 30, 300)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (11, 30, 300)-net over F128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 10, 150)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128, using
- digital (1, 20, 150)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128 (see above)
- digital (1, 10, 150)-net over F128, using
(11, 30, 301)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (11, 30, 301)-net over F128, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(12830, 301, F128, 3, 19) (dual of [(301, 3), 873, 20]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(1289, 129, F128, 3, 9) (dual of [(129, 3), 378, 10]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(3;378,128) [i]
- linear OOA(12821, 172, F128, 3, 19) (dual of [(172, 3), 495, 20]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(3;F,496P) [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
- linear OOA(1289, 129, F128, 3, 9) (dual of [(129, 3), 378, 10]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(11, 30, 321)-Net in Base 128
(11, 30, 321)-net in base 128, using
- 42 times m-reduction [i] based on (11, 72, 321)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 63, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 63, 321)-net over F256, using
(11, 30, 201297)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (11, 30, 201298)-net in base 128, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (11, 29, 201298)-net in base 128, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 12 855963 752541 907833 563644 203345 919080 887742 046550 072339 455314 > 12829 [i]