Best Known (11, 47, s)-Nets in Base 128
(11, 47, 288)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (11, 47, 288)-net over F128, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (9, 47, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
(11, 47, 296)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (11, 47, 296)-net over F128, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (10, 47, 296)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 295)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 296, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 295)-sequence over F128, using
(11, 47, 321)-Net in Base 128
(11, 47, 321)-net in base 128, using
- 25 times m-reduction [i] based on (11, 72, 321)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 63, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 63, 321)-net over F256, using
(11, 47, 18892)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (11, 47, 18893)-net in base 128, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 1094 251434 586003 368870 891533 290358 631504 324597 029325 971338 360705 172399 739361 747584 805371 893360 739160 > 12847 [i]