Best Known (11, 53, s)-Nets in Base 128
(11, 53, 288)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (11, 53, 288)-net over F128, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (9, 53, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
(11, 53, 296)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (11, 53, 296)-net over F128, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (10, 53, 296)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 295)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 296, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 295)-sequence over F128, using
(11, 53, 321)-Net in Base 128
(11, 53, 321)-net in base 128, using
- 19 times m-reduction [i] based on (11, 72, 321)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 63, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 63, 321)-net over F256, using
(11, 53, 14209)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (11, 53, 14210)-net in base 128, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 4814 275088 324901 299900 725862 464873 347488 249484 920185 694601 250758 204239 047960 825569 656382 165959 035583 503585 173472 > 12853 [i]