Best Known (15, 56, s)-Nets in Base 128
(15, 56, 288)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (15, 56, 288)-net over F128, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (9, 56, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
(15, 56, 386)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (15, 56, 386)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 385)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 386, using
(15, 56, 513)-Net in Base 128
(15, 56, 513)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (8, 49, 513)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 512)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- K1,1 from the tower of function fields by Niederreiter and Xing based on the tower by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F256 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 512)-sequence over F256, using
(15, 56, 40759)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (15, 56, 40760)-net in base 128, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (15, 55, 40760)-net in base 128, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 78 829897 840351 967299 637369 561838 269284 918026 626828 640821 605571 600396 383419 736838 768380 198778 128183 629081 037188 198157 > 12855 [i]