Best Known (11, 57, s)-Nets in Base 128
(11, 57, 288)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (11, 57, 288)-net over F128, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (9, 57, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
(11, 57, 296)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (11, 57, 296)-net over F128, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (10, 57, 296)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 295)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 296, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 295)-sequence over F128, using
(11, 57, 321)-Net in Base 128
(11, 57, 321)-net in base 128, using
- 15 times m-reduction [i] based on (11, 72, 321)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 63, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 63, 321)-net over F256, using
(11, 57, 12373)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (11, 57, 12374)-net in base 128, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 1 293432 899541 976994 270097 189574 549880 061321 708760 414139 844196 474178 937986 841037 886169 785373 006933 499798 984096 446044 802080 > 12857 [i]