Best Known (29, 66, s)-Nets in Base 128
(29, 66, 438)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 66, 438)-net over F128, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (29, 67, 438)-net over F128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 20, 150)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128, using
- digital (9, 47, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- digital (1, 20, 150)-net over F128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(29, 66, 516)-Net in Base 128 — Constructive
(29, 66, 516)-net in base 128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- (4, 22, 258)-net in base 128, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (4, 24, 258)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 21, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 21, 258)-net over F256, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (4, 24, 258)-net in base 128, using
- (7, 44, 258)-net in base 128, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (7, 48, 258)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 42, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 42, 258)-net over F256, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (7, 48, 258)-net in base 128, using
- (4, 22, 258)-net in base 128, using
(29, 66, 839)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (29, 66, 839)-net over F128, using
(29, 66, 2419324)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 66, 2419325)-net in base 128, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 65, 2419325)-net in base 128, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 93035 718941 523841 926460 978362 277715 269817 322483 727236 415982 814780 777692 484353 352203 207244 879049 063698 049688 033115 779348 050389 622577 142146 > 12865 [i]