MinT - Best Known (32, 66, s)-Nets in Base 128

Best Known (32, 66, s)-Nets in Base 128

(32, 66, 504)-Net over F₁₂₈ — Constructive and digital

Digital (32, 66, 504)-net over F₁₂₈, using

2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (32, 68, 504)-net over F₁₂₈, using
- (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
  1. digital (5, 23, 216)-net over F₁₂₈, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F₁₂₈, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₂₈ with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
        a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]
  2. digital (9, 45, 288)-net over F₁₂₈, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F₁₂₈, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₂₈ with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
        a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(32, 66, 548)-Net in Base 128 — Constructive

(32, 66, 548)-net in base 128, using

(u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. (6, 23, 260)-net in base 128, using
  - 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (6, 24, 260)-net in base 128, using
    - base change [i] based on digital (3, 21, 260)-net over F₂₅₆, using
      - net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F₂₅₆, using
        Niederreiter sequence [i]
2. digital (9, 43, 288)-net over F₁₂₈, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F₁₂₈, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₂₈ with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(32, 66, 1715)-Net over F₁₂₈ — Digital

Digital (32, 66, 1715)-net over F₁₂₈, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(32, 66, large)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s

There is no (32, 66, large)-net in base 128, because

32 times m-reduction [i] would yield (32, 34, large)-net in base 128, but
- mutually orthogonal hypercube bound [i]