Best Known (27, 68, s)-Nets in Base 128
(27, 68, 384)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (27, 68, 384)-net over F128, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (27, 69, 384)-net over F128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 24, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- digital (3, 45, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128 (see above)
- digital (3, 24, 192)-net over F128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(27, 68, 407)-Net in Base 128 — Constructive
(27, 68, 407)-net in base 128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 21, 150)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128, using
- (6, 47, 257)-net in base 128, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (6, 48, 257)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 42, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 42, 257)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (6, 48, 257)-net in base 128, using
- digital (1, 21, 150)-net over F128, using
(27, 68, 515)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (27, 68, 515)-net over F128, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(12868, 515, F128, 2, 41) (dual of [(515, 2), 962, 42]-NRT-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(2;F,982P) ⊂ AG(2;F,986P) [i] based on
- linear OOA(12865, 512, F128, 2, 41) (dual of [(512, 2), 959, 42]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(2;F,982P) [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- linear OOA(12861, 512, F128, 2, 37) (dual of [(512, 2), 963, 38]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(2;F,986P) [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 513 (see above)
- linear OOA(1283, 3, F128, 2, 3) (dual of [(3, 2), 3, 4]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(1283, 128, F128, 2, 3) (dual of [(128, 2), 253, 4]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;253,128) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(1283, 128, F128, 2, 3) (dual of [(128, 2), 253, 4]-NRT-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(2;F,982P) ⊂ AG(2;F,986P) [i] based on
(27, 68, 749290)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (27, 68, 749291)-net in base 128, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (27, 67, 749291)-net in base 128, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 1524 305706 310495 036817 176262 872118 918379 536328 714746 684838 925020 101345 757877 258703 333774 922238 624390 459500 779350 091852 883944 481134 291549 078308 > 12867 [i]