Best Known (46, 71, s)-Nets in Base 128
(46, 71, 1752)-Net over F128 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 71, 1752)-net over F128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 22, 387)-net over F128, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (10, 23, 387)-net over F128, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 4, 129)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 128)-sequence over F128, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- the rational function field F128(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 128)-sequence over F128, using
- digital (0, 6, 129)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 128)-sequence over F128 (see above)
- digital (0, 13, 129)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 128)-sequence over F128 (see above)
- digital (0, 4, 129)-net over F128, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (10, 23, 387)-net over F128, using
- digital (24, 49, 1365)-net over F128, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(12849, 1365, F128, 25, 25) (dual of [(1365, 25), 34076, 26]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 12-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(12849, 16381, F128, 25) (dual of [16381, 16332, 26]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(12849, 16384, F128, 25) (dual of [16384, 16335, 26]-code), using
- an extension Ce(24) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16383 = 1282−1, defining interval I = [1,24], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 25 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(12849, 16384, F128, 25) (dual of [16384, 16335, 26]-code), using
- OOA 12-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(12849, 16381, F128, 25) (dual of [16381, 16332, 26]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(12849, 1365, F128, 25, 25) (dual of [(1365, 25), 34076, 26]-NRT-code), using
- digital (10, 22, 387)-net over F128, using
(46, 71, 5719)-Net in Base 128 — Constructive
(46, 71, 5719)-net in base 128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- (3, 15, 258)-net in base 128, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (3, 16, 258)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 14, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 14, 258)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (3, 16, 258)-net in base 128, using
- (31, 56, 5461)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (24, 49, 5461)-net over F256, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25649, 5461, F256, 25, 25) (dual of [(5461, 25), 136476, 26]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 12-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(25649, 65533, F256, 25) (dual of [65533, 65484, 26]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25649, 65536, F256, 25) (dual of [65536, 65487, 26]-code), using
- an extension Ce(24) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535 = 2562−1, defining interval I = [1,24], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 25 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25649, 65536, F256, 25) (dual of [65536, 65487, 26]-code), using
- OOA 12-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(25649, 65533, F256, 25) (dual of [65533, 65484, 26]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25649, 5461, F256, 25, 25) (dual of [(5461, 25), 136476, 26]-NRT-code), using
- base change [i] based on digital (24, 49, 5461)-net over F256, using
- (3, 15, 258)-net in base 128, using
(46, 71, 132260)-Net over F128 — Digital
Digital (46, 71, 132260)-net over F128, using
(46, 71, large)-Net in Base 128 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 71, large)-net in base 128, because
- 23 times m-reduction [i] would yield (46, 48, large)-net in base 128, but