MinT - Best Known (129−103, 129, s)-Nets in Base 16

Best Known (129−103, 129, s)-Nets in Base 16

(129−103, 129, 65)-Net over F₁₆ — Constructive and digital

Digital (26, 129, 65)-net over F₁₆, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 129, 65)-net over F₁₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F₁₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
    - the Hermitian function field over F₁₆ [i]

(129−103, 129, 66)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive

(26, 129, 66)-net in base 16, using

t-expansion [i] based on (25, 129, 66)-net in base 16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (25, 65)-sequence in base 16, using
  - base expansion [i] based on digital (50, 65)-sequence over F₄, using
    - t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F₄, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₄ with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
        T₆ from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F₄ [i]

(129−103, 129, 150)-Net over F₁₆ — Digital

Digital (26, 129, 150)-net over F₁₆, using

net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 149)-sequence over F₁₆, using
- Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
  - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(129−103, 129, 1364)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s

There is no (26, 129, 1365)-net in base 16, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 128, 1365)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16^mÂ â‰¥ 13665 271826 467174 387923 693567 717292 698963 038175 027090 810242 166570 768480 772114 664219 740014 487802 182859 070007 308520 719159 182713 021772 821358 745323 213933 937976 > 16¹²⁸ [i]