Best Known (64−11, 64, s)-Nets in Base 16
(64−11, 64, 3355440)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (53, 64, 3355440)-net over F16, using
- 162 times duplication [i] based on digital (51, 62, 3355440)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (20, 31, 1677720)-net over F256, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25631, 1677720, F256, 11, 11) (dual of [(1677720, 11), 18454889, 12]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 5-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(25631, 8388601, F256, 11) (dual of [8388601, 8388570, 12]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25631, large, F256, 11) (dual of [large, large−31, 12]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777215 = 2563−1, defining interval I = [0,10], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 12 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25631, large, F256, 11) (dual of [large, large−31, 12]-code), using
- OOA 5-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(25631, 8388601, F256, 11) (dual of [8388601, 8388570, 12]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25631, 1677720, F256, 11, 11) (dual of [(1677720, 11), 18454889, 12]-NRT-code), using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (20, 31, 1677720)-net over F256, using
(64−11, 64, large)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (53, 64, large)-net over F16, using
- 163 times duplication [i] based on digital (50, 61, large)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(1661, large, F16, 11) (dual of [large, large−61, 12]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777217 | 1612−1, defining interval I = [0,5], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−5,−4,…,5}|+1 = 12 (BCH-bound) [i]
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(1661, large, F16, 11) (dual of [large, large−61, 12]-code), using
(64−11, 64, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (53, 64, large)-net in base 16, because
- 9 times m-reduction [i] would yield (53, 55, large)-net in base 16, but