Best Known (14, 14+11, s)-Nets in Base 16
(14, 14+11, 516)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (14, 25, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (14, 26, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 13, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 13, 258)-net over F256, using
(14, 14+11, 578)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (14, 25, 578)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (14, 26, 578)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 13, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 13, 289)-net over F256, using
(14, 14+11, 104595)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (14, 25, 104596)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (14, 24, 104596)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 79231 681277 012821 937397 345076 > 1624 [i]