Best Known (17, 17+11, s)-Nets in Base 16
(17, 17+11, 538)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (17, 28, 538)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 6, 24)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (11, 22, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 11, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 11, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (1, 6, 24)-net over F16, using
(17, 17+11, 740)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (17, 28, 740)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1628, 740, F16, 11) (dual of [740, 712, 12]-code), using
- 158 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 8 times 0, 1, 38 times 0, 1, 109 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1624, 578, F16, 11) (dual of [578, 554, 12]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25612, 289, F256, 11) (dual of [289, 277, 12]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,277P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25612, 289, F256, 11) (dual of [289, 277, 12]-code), using
- 158 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 8 times 0, 1, 38 times 0, 1, 109 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1624, 578, F16, 11) (dual of [578, 554, 12]-code), using
(17, 17+11, 552066)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (17, 28, 552067)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (17, 27, 552067)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 324 521269 373823 036729 147734 771776 > 1627 [i]