Best Known (29−13, 29, s)-Nets in Base 16
(29−13, 29, 516)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (16, 29, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (16, 30, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 15, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 15, 258)-net over F256, using
(29−13, 29, 578)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (16, 29, 578)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (16, 30, 578)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 15, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 15, 289)-net over F256, using
(29−13, 29, 83050)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (16, 29, 83051)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (16, 28, 83051)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 5192 484881 775677 162327 026205 895466 > 1628 [i]