Best Known (21, 21+15, s)-Nets in Base 16
(21, 21+15, 520)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (21, 36, 520)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 18, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
(21, 21+15, 652)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (21, 36, 652)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1636, 652, F16, 15) (dual of [652, 616, 16]-code), using
- 8 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 7 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1634, 642, F16, 15) (dual of [642, 608, 16]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25617, 321, F256, 15) (dual of [321, 304, 16]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,305P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25617, 321, F256, 15) (dual of [321, 304, 16]-code), using
- 8 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 7 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1634, 642, F16, 15) (dual of [642, 608, 16]-code), using
(21, 21+15, 236276)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (21, 36, 236277)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (21, 35, 236277)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 1 393808 203623 308045 244239 179708 748145 405136 > 1635 [i]