Best Known (91, 91+19, s)-Nets in Base 16
(91, 91+19, 1864132)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (91, 110, 1864132)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (36, 55, 932066)-net over F256, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25655, 932066, F256, 19, 19) (dual of [(932066, 19), 17709199, 20]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 9-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(25655, 8388595, F256, 19) (dual of [8388595, 8388540, 20]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25655, large, F256, 19) (dual of [large, large−55, 20]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777215 = 2563−1, defining interval I = [0,18], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 20 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25655, large, F256, 19) (dual of [large, large−55, 20]-code), using
- OOA 9-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(25655, 8388595, F256, 19) (dual of [8388595, 8388540, 20]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25655, 932066, F256, 19, 19) (dual of [(932066, 19), 17709199, 20]-NRT-code), using
(91, 91+19, large)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (91, 110, large)-net over F16, using
- 161 times duplication [i] based on digital (90, 109, large)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 109, large)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(16109, large, F16, 20) (dual of [large, large−109, 21]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777215 = 166−1, defining interval I = [0,19], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 21 [i]
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(16109, large, F16, 20) (dual of [large, large−109, 21]-code), using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 109, large)-net over F16, using
(91, 91+19, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (91, 110, large)-net in base 16, because
- 17 times m-reduction [i] would yield (91, 93, large)-net in base 16, but