Best Known (25, 25+20, s)-Nets in Base 16
(25, 25+20, 518)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (25, 45, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (25, 46, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 23, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 23, 259)-net over F256, using
(25, 25+20, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (25, 45, 642)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (25, 46, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 23, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 23, 321)-net over F256, using
(25, 25+20, 79140)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (25, 45, 79141)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 1 532669 112464 792637 538217 916750 166826 562938 162433 668776 > 1645 [i]