Best Known (35, 35+21, s)-Nets in Base 16
(35, 35+21, 559)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 56, 559)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 14, 45)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 44)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 45, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 44)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (21, 42, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 21, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 21, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (4, 14, 45)-net over F16, using
(35, 35+21, 1312)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (35, 56, 1312)-net over F16, using
(35, 35+21, 1266319)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 56, 1266320)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 55, 1266320)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 1 685007 886901 418681 884263 916735 625823 330147 370168 133546 817969 274251 > 1655 [i]