Best Known (127−23, 127, s)-Nets in Base 16
(127−23, 127, 762600)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (104, 127, 762600)-net over F16, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(16127, 762600, F16, 23, 23) (dual of [(762600, 23), 17539673, 24]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 11-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(16127, 8388601, F16, 23) (dual of [8388601, 8388474, 24]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(16127, large, F16, 23) (dual of [large, large−127, 24]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777215 = 166−1, defining interval I = [0,22], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 24 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(16127, large, F16, 23) (dual of [large, large−127, 24]-code), using
- OOA 11-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(16127, 8388601, F16, 23) (dual of [8388601, 8388474, 24]-code), using
(127−23, 127, large)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (104, 127, large)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(16127, large, F16, 23) (dual of [large, large−127, 24]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777215 = 166−1, defining interval I = [0,22], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 24 [i]
(127−23, 127, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (104, 127, large)-net in base 16, because
- 21 times m-reduction [i] would yield (104, 106, large)-net in base 16, but