Best Known (26, 26+23, s)-Nets in Base 16
(26, 26+23, 516)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 49, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (26, 50, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 25, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 25, 258)-net over F256, using
(26, 26+23, 578)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (26, 49, 578)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (26, 50, 578)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 25, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 25, 289)-net over F256, using
(26, 26+23, 58779)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 49, 58780)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 48, 58780)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 6278 262384 980538 882642 457078 644635 676015 709278 091854 556201 > 1648 [i]