Best Known (36, 36+23, s)-Nets in Base 16
(36, 36+23, 547)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 59, 547)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 13, 33)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 32)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 32)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (23, 46, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 23, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 23, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (2, 13, 33)-net over F16, using
(36, 36+23, 1034)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (36, 59, 1034)-net over F16, using
(36, 36+23, 730997)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 59, 730998)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 58, 730998)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 6901 820753 661939 854230 479186 287342 693489 820690 094901 883276 561950 970796 > 1658 [i]