Best Known (40, 40+23, s)-Nets in Base 16
(40, 40+23, 579)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (40, 63, 579)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 17, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (23, 46, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 23, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 23, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (6, 17, 65)-net over F16, using
(40, 40+23, 1705)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (40, 63, 1705)-net over F16, using
(40, 40+23, 2003455)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (40, 63, 2003456)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (40, 62, 2003456)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 452 313656 415358 193835 161360 488496 378429 856596 239483 254400 430527 556484 018241 > 1662 [i]