Best Known (65−25, 65, s)-Nets in Base 16
(65−25, 65, 552)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (40, 65, 552)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 15, 38)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 37)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 37)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (25, 50, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 25, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 25, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (3, 15, 38)-net over F16, using
(65−25, 65, 1204)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (40, 65, 1204)-net over F16, using
(65−25, 65, 931623)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (40, 65, 931624)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (40, 64, 931624)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 115792 759431 911396 254919 476840 951041 942371 641087 880933 656643 719694 055944 439196 > 1664 [i]