MinT - Best Known (65, 65+25, s)-Nets in Base 16

Best Known (65, 65+25, s)-Nets in Base 16

(65, 65+25, 1542)-Net over F₁₆ — Constructive and digital

Digital (65, 90, 1542)-net over F₁₆, using

generalized (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (8, 16, 514)-net over F₁₆, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 8, 257)-net over F₂₅₆, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F₂₅₆, using
      - generalized Faure sequence [i]
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₅₆ with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
        the rational function field F₂₅₆(x) [i]
      - Niederreiter sequence [i]
2. digital (12, 24, 514)-net over F₁₆, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 12, 257)-net over F₂₅₆, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F₂₅₆ (see above)
3. digital (25, 50, 514)-net over F₁₆, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 25, 257)-net over F₂₅₆, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F₂₅₆ (see above)

(65, 65+25, 21427)-Net over F₁₆ — Digital

Digital (65, 90, 21427)-net over F₁₆, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(65, 65+25, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s

There is no (65, 90, large)-net in base 16, because

23 times m-reduction [i] would yield (65, 67, large)-net in base 16, but
- mutually orthogonal hypercube bound [i]