Best Known (29, 29+26, s)-Nets in Base 16
(29, 29+26, 516)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 55, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (29, 56, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 28, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 28, 258)-net over F256, using
(29, 29+26, 578)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (29, 55, 578)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (29, 56, 578)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 28, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 28, 289)-net over F256, using
(29, 29+26, 46946)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 55, 46947)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 1 685131 240543 950052 217316 511726 276316 265441 344145 853883 347577 860816 > 1655 [i]