Best Known (68, 68+26, s)-Nets in Base 16
(68, 68+26, 1542)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (68, 94, 1542)-net over F16, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 16, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 8, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 8, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (13, 26, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 13, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 13, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (26, 52, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 26, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 26, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (8, 16, 514)-net over F16, using
(68, 68+26, 22870)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (68, 94, 22870)-net over F16, using
(68, 68+26, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (68, 94, large)-net in base 16, because
- 24 times m-reduction [i] would yield (68, 70, large)-net in base 16, but