Best Known (72−29, 72, s)-Nets in Base 16
(72−29, 72, 531)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (43, 72, 531)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 14, 17)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 16)-sequence over F16, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 17, using
- the rational function field F16(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 16)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (29, 58, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 29, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 29, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (0, 14, 17)-net over F16, using
(72−29, 72, 954)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (43, 72, 954)-net over F16, using
(72−29, 72, 515191)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (43, 72, 515192)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (43, 71, 515192)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 31 083115 900566 140379 258097 901592 344761 890126 212648 924989 570100 224062 378873 684312 620746 > 1671 [i]