Best Known (61, 61+29, s)-Nets in Base 16
(61, 61+29, 1032)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (61, 90, 1032)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (16, 30, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 15, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 15, 258)-net over F256, using
- digital (31, 60, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 30, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 30, 258)-net over F256, using
- digital (16, 30, 516)-net over F16, using
(61, 61+29, 5602)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (61, 90, 5602)-net over F16, using
(61, 61+29, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (61, 90, large)-net in base 16, because
- 27 times m-reduction [i] would yield (61, 63, large)-net in base 16, but