Best Known (54, 54+31, s)-Nets in Base 16
(54, 54+31, 581)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (54, 85, 581)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 21, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (33, 64, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 32, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 32, 258)-net over F256, using
- digital (6, 21, 65)-net over F16, using
(54, 54+31, 2087)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (54, 85, 2087)-net over F16, using
(54, 54+31, 2369986)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (54, 85, 2369987)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (54, 84, 2369987)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 139984 748488 003872 415405 256154 331877 054808 477081 776304 569065 075014 807300 027691 583482 109099 227602 688576 > 1684 [i]