Best Known (116−32, 116, s)-Nets in Base 16
(116−32, 116, 1542)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (84, 116, 1542)-net over F16, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 20, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 10, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 10, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (16, 32, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 16, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 16, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (32, 64, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 32, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 32, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (10, 20, 514)-net over F16, using
(116−32, 116, 26542)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (84, 116, 26542)-net over F16, using
(116−32, 116, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (84, 116, large)-net in base 16, because
- 30 times m-reduction [i] would yield (84, 86, large)-net in base 16, but