Best Known (42, 42+32, s)-Nets in Base 16
(42, 42+32, 524)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (42, 74, 524)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 37, 262)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 261)-sequence over F256, using
(42, 42+32, 669)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (42, 74, 669)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1674, 669, F16, 32) (dual of [669, 595, 33]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1674, 673, F16, 32) (dual of [673, 599, 33]-code), using
- 25 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 1, 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 15 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1668, 642, F16, 32) (dual of [642, 574, 33]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25634, 321, F256, 32) (dual of [321, 287, 33]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,288P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25634, 321, F256, 32) (dual of [321, 287, 33]-code), using
- 25 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 1, 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 15 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1668, 642, F16, 32) (dual of [642, 574, 33]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1674, 673, F16, 32) (dual of [673, 599, 33]-code), using
(42, 42+32, 168066)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (42, 74, 168067)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 127325 060979 501746 136934 081601 173025 708968 465424 191419 532320 664370 394363 934645 904847 286456 > 1674 [i]