Best Known (54, 54+32, s)-Nets in Base 16
(54, 54+32, 579)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (54, 86, 579)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 22, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (32, 64, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 32, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 32, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (6, 22, 65)-net over F16, using
(54, 54+32, 1828)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (54, 86, 1828)-net over F16, using
(54, 54+32, 1344589)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (54, 86, 1344590)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 35 836274 492032 126825 041947 198651 235627 522373 265994 858996 719809 110526 703207 163990 739815 525171 955314 113476 > 1686 [i]