Best Known (77, 77+32, s)-Nets in Base 16
(77, 77+32, 1066)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (77, 109, 1066)-net over F16, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 13, 38)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 37)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 37)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (16, 32, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 16, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 16, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (32, 64, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 32, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 32, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (3, 13, 38)-net over F16, using
(77, 77+32, 14199)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (77, 109, 14199)-net over F16, using
(77, 77+32, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (77, 109, large)-net in base 16, because
- 30 times m-reduction [i] would yield (77, 79, large)-net in base 16, but