Best Known (71−33, 71, s)-Nets in Base 16
(71−33, 71, 518)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (38, 71, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (38, 72, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 36, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 36, 259)-net over F256, using
(71−33, 71, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (38, 71, 642)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (38, 72, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 36, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 36, 321)-net over F256, using
(71−33, 71, 84028)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (38, 71, 84029)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (38, 70, 84029)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 1 942746 042083 527021 385554 772513 779172 678690 946049 525597 456437 180202 012839 606027 974461 > 1670 [i]