Best Known (36, 36+33, s)-Nets in Base 16
(36, 36+33, 516)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 69, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (36, 70, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 35, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 35, 258)-net over F256, using
(36, 36+33, 578)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (36, 69, 578)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (36, 70, 578)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 35, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 35, 289)-net over F256, using
(36, 36+33, 59414)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 69, 59415)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 68, 59415)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 7588 919649 477098 710504 708655 132727 763423 758926 157474 425164 633228 934806 845692 762101 > 1668 [i]