Best Known (81−39, 81, s)-Nets in Base 16
(81−39, 81, 516)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (42, 81, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (42, 82, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 41, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 41, 258)-net over F256, using
(81−39, 81, 578)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (42, 81, 578)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (42, 82, 578)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 41, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 41, 289)-net over F256, using
(81−39, 81, 62091)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (42, 81, 62092)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (42, 80, 62092)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 2 136391 424477 494246 442661 415697 449265 420676 077040 055219 518231 257776 069938 677191 199224 373650 391896 > 1680 [i]