Best Known (35, 35+39, s)-Nets in Base 16
(35, 35+39, 130)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 74, 130)-net over F16, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (35, 81, 130)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 29, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (6, 52, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16 (see above)
- digital (6, 29, 65)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(35, 35+39, 177)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(35, 74, 177)-net in base 16, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on (35, 84, 177)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 56, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 56, 177)-net over F64, using
(35, 35+39, 217)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (35, 74, 217)-net over F16, using
(35, 35+39, 225)-Net in Base 16
(35, 74, 225)-net in base 16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (35, 75, 225)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (10, 50, 225)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 224)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 224)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (10, 50, 225)-net over F64, using
(35, 35+39, 22350)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 74, 22351)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 73, 22351)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 7962 885433 101831 948691 718375 821822 546551 066353 431884 772133 637624 281940 604955 736791 685136 > 1673 [i]